Upholding the sole purpose of an SMSF

Happy young family

It is likely that you have heard about the ATO’s recent Interpretive Decision determining that having a life insurance policy inside an SMSF, where the policy is a consequence of a buy sell arrangement, may be in breach of the sole purpose test. If you have not yet heard of this decision, you can read the details here.

So what does this mean for your clients?


Broadly, the sole purpose test – found in s62 of the SIS Act – requires SMSF trustees to maintain the fund (and therefore life insurance policies on the lives of members) for the purpose of providing its members with a retirement or death benefit. Each case should be considered individually to determine if, by holding an insurance policy inside the SMSF, this will breach the sole purpose test.

Two questions you should consider are:

  1. What was the reason that the SMSF came to hold the insurance policy?
    If the reason is solely as a consequence of a buy sell arrangement, then holding the insurance policy inside the SMSF is likely to be in breach of the sole purpose test.
  2. Is the purpose to receive payment for the member’s share of the business? 
    If so, then this is also likely to breach the sole purpose test as the purpose is to fund the transfer of the member’s business interest, not provide a retirement or death benefit to the member or beneficiaries.

Another matter to consider is whether the parties to the buy sell arrangement are related. If they are related (for example siblings, parent and child, or husband and wife) then it is likely that the SMSF will also contravene s65(1)(b) of the SIS Act, in that it is providing financial assistance to a relative of a member. Financial assistance is provided where:

  • The relative is not paying premiums for the insurance policy; and
  • The relative receives the member’s share of the business without paying any consideration themselves.

If you believe that your client has structured their insurance in a way that may breach the sole purpose test you should:

  1. Contact the client’s accountant and/or lawyer to determine whether the structure is in fact a breach of the sole purpose test; and
  2. Work with the accountant and/or lawyer to devise a strategy to rectify the insurance ownership.

Please feel free to call Ian Tindale or Emily O’Brien on 07 3223 6100 if you have concerns with any of your clients’ business succession structures.

Back to Articles
Redchip

Recent Articles

Antivirus, hacker protection.
Defending against the indefensible

You’d imagine that a law firm with as strong an IP pedigree as Redchip would have no problems defending itself from people preying on the success of our business. Sadly, even we aren’t immune to rip offs and poaching expeditions.

Read more
Blue and orange sunset sky
Heaven can wait

Recently I heard someone say: “everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die”. Our mortality is such a taboo topic that it impacts the way in which many people approach their Wills and Estate Planning.

Read more
girl plays superhero
From shark bait to superheroes

Three life lessons for start-ups. There’s never been more buzz surrounding the start-up community, but all this excitement doesn’t come without its fair share of hurdles and legal pitfalls.

Read more