Assets in one entity pose significant risk

Close-up of businessman stopping the effect of domino with hand

There is a truism in structuring a business, that the more tax paid equates to less working capital. And the more assets a business owns, the greater the risk to which it is exposed.

We often see businesses operating under structures where their valuable assets sit within one entity. Not only does this expose them to significant risk, but they are often paying more tax than necessary and, in turn, reducing their working capital.


There are some restructuring solutions that can provide a string of benefits to clients in this situation.

The two most common business structures we see are:

The first structure involves a family trading trust distributing to a bucket company. In this scenario, Division 7A implications generally reduce access to working capital and the assets are exposed to attack from creditors. This is a major asset protection problem.

A restructure, if properly implemented, can be achieved with no stamp duty implications and no tax implications by applying CGT small business relief, including the retirement exemption and the small business restructure rollover.

This restructure involves the introduction of an asset trust and achieves asset protection where valuable assets (being goodwill and valuable depreciating PPE) are separated from the trading trust. Access to the CGT discount is maintained.

A restructure would sit a bit differently, but with similar effect, where CGT small business relief and small business restructure rollover do not apply. The structure below, if properly implemented, can also be achieved with no tax or stamp duty implications:

This structure achieves asset protection where valuable assets (being goodwill and valuable PPE) are separated from the trading entity. A significant amount of profit is taxed at the company rate and is not subject to Division 7A, thus improving working capital.  Access to the CGT discount is, once again, maintained.

The second common business structure – being a trading company owned by a family trust – has good access to working capital; however, asset protection is a major problem.

Again, a properly implemented restructure can be achieved with no stamp duty implications or tax implications. This is done by introducing a company to hold the valuable assets, and applying CGT small business relief including the retirement exemption or CGT rollovers and tax consolidation. The new structure would take the following form:

This structure achieves asset protection where valuable assets (being goodwill, retained profits and depreciating and valuable PPE) are separated from the trading company and profits can continue to be retained and taxed at the company rate.

If you, or your clients, currently operate under a structure where all of your assets sit within one entity, you may wish to consider a restructure to improve your asset protection, tax implications and access to working capital. Please contact Trung Vu at tax@redchip.com.au or phone 07 3223 6100 to discuss a structure that will work for your specific business.

For more information on asset protection measures, you can read the Separation Anxiety white paper created by our friends at Acis.

Back to Articles
Redchip

Recent Articles

The road to success is a slippery one at best
Common legal pitfalls for start-ups

This excerpt from a chapter we contributed to the QUT Blue Book: Tips for Start-up Founders at QUT looks at the legal fundamentals for any new business to avoid pitfalls down the track.

Read more
Glass of beer on the table
What ails Pacific Ale?

When you have a successful business, competition is never far away. Properly protecting unique brand elements is vital in securing your market position and keeping competitors at bay, as Stone & Wood recently discovered the hard way.

Read more
Young businesspeople using digital tablet in lobby
Clients front and centre in tech debate

In assessing the deployment of technology, businesses can fall into the trap of focussing on the upfront cost and the potential short term returns. If we instead work back from the client outcome, then the decision-making process becomes clearer.

Read more