Moving Light Moving Light

Resources Ensuring Enforceability: Claw Back Mechanisms in Commercial Leasing

  • Posted by Insight by Rhennen Ford
  • Published Current as at 22 August 2023
  • Category Insights

With the evolving business landscape and changing work patterns following the pandemic, commercial leasing has become increasingly competitive. To attract new tenants to their premises, landlords commonly offer incentives such as rent-free periods, rent reductions or fit-out contributions. Claw back provisions are applied to these incentives, allowing landlords to recover costs should the tenants fail to observe their obligations under the lease, to ensure the Landlord is not left out of pocket.

However, claw back provisions are not always a secure safety-net for landlords. A recent case sheds light on the importance of careful drafting and review of such clauses to ensure their effectiveness and enforceability.

This article explores the intricacies of claw back mechanisms in commercial leasing, drawing insights from a notable case, and provides guidance for landlords navigating incentive arrangements.

Reality Hits – Alamdo Holdings V Croc’s Franchising

The recent case of Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v Croc’s Franchising Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 60 offers valuable insights into the enforceability of claw back mechanisms specific to fit-out contributions. In this case, the Court ruled that a contractually agreed claw back provision went beyond protecting the landlord’s interests and, thus, constituted an unenforceable penalty.

The landlord, Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd (Alamdo), leased a property to Croc’s Franchising Pty Ltd (Croc’s). The Lease included an Incentive Deed providing a contribution of $250,000 towards the tenant’s fit-out. When Croc’s failed to pay the rent, Alamdo terminated the lease and sought to recover a proportion of this incentive contribution based on the remaining lease term, pursuant to the claw back mechanisms in the Deed.

Croc’s argued that the provisions in the Lease and Incentive Deed, which facilitated the repayment of the incentive, were unenforceable penalties. To determine the validity of the claw back provision, the Court examined two key questions:

  1. Did the provision act as a threat or punishment for non-compliance with lease obligations?
  2. Did the provision genuinely reflect a pre-estimate of damages, guarding the legitimate interests of the landlord?
    Considering prevailing legal principles, the Court found that the claw back mechanism exceeded the necessary protection of Alamdo’s interests. As Alamdo was already able to recover its rental arrears and loss of bargain damages, allowing Alamdo to also recover a portion of the incentive, which contributed to fit-out costs the landlord retained ownership of, would result in a better outcome for the landlord than if the lease had run its full course. Consequently, the Court deemed the provisions as punitive, ultimately ruling against the enforceability of the claw back mechanism.
Guidance For Landlords

The Alamdo Holdings case highlights the challenges associated with enforcing claw back provisions. Landlords should consider the following factors to protect their interests:

  1. Market Context: Acknowledge that incentives reflect prevailing market conditions and concessions made to secure leases, which may not be recoverable if the lease terminates prematurely.
  2. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the tenant’s financial standing and the likelihood of default when structuring incentives and designing claw back provisions.
  3. Nuanced Incentive Structures: Explore alternative approaches, such as secured financing arrangements, which provide landlords with broader enforcement rights to recover fit-out contributions in case of tenant default.
  4. Abatements and Mitigation: Consider structuring incentives as abatements throughout the lease term, as opposed to upfront incentives, to mitigate the risks associated with unenforceable repayment clauses and later default.

Ensuring that incentive arrangements are nuanced and well-balanced, and that the claw back provisions are enforceable, is crucial for landlords in commercial leasing. By carefully considering market conditions, assessing risks, and exploring alternative structures, landlords can better protect their interests while continuing to offer competitive lease incentives.

We regularly assist landlords in drafting and reviewing commercial leases, considering the legal context and commercial implications of the agreement and provisions. Contact us to discuss your next move.